No. The moat was rarely flooded even in its own time. Records show it was used for livestock and you can clearly see a shot furnace that was built in the moat for heating canon balls. These details and more clearly indicate flooding was a last resort option that was never needed.
No.
I didn't see any, but it was dark white I was there.
Very little.
No but it did look soggy on the north side of the fort.
No the moat was placed as a barrier but not for water. When the society of St Augustine added water it caused a crack in the structure.
No it's been kinda dry lately
No, just grassy area
No water in the moat. They say it's more historically accurate since the moat area was mostly used for livestock.
Thanks! Your answer is awaiting moderation.