Has anybody had a successful claim for AO or any other type of toxic exposure while stationed @ Subic Bay Naval Station

David Roth | Sep 6, 2020 | Category: Law firm in Orlando, Florida

Hill and Ponton, P.A. - All questions

Address: 605 E Robinson St # 635, Orlando, FL 32801, USA

Chad Hill | Sep 6, 2020

David. Read this post that Attorney Matt Hill wrote several years ago about a veteran that he represented who was able to prove AO exposure @ Subic Bay Naval Station. He also discusses the difference between direct and presumptive exposure - https://www.hillandponton.com/direct-exposure-to-agent-orange-2/

Betty Lee | Sep 6, 2020

Check with them...they have been successful for lots of different types of claims

David Roth | Sep 6, 2020

Your firm represents the two Marines whom won their case there. They were assigned to the mag wheels that the shipment from new Zealand was being stored. That was mid 1972 when they were there. I was there in July 73 on TDA wtg to be transferred to the Coral Sea already in the Tonkin Gulf underway to Yankee Station. While there for over 3 weeks I ate the fish, crab, muscles... every day while temp stationed there plus every time e came back to port. I am rated10% SC for tinnitus & they gave me a nonSC rating but at least did tag me as having 6 illnesses that were both diagnosed by the VA but also qualified and classified as being on presumpted list caused by exposure. Since it's been established by case law that AO was stored at Subic Bay,, do I have any chance of a making a Nexus to succeed?

Add Answer

Thanks! Your answer is awaiting moderation.

Trending Places