Address: 24 Veterans Sq. Suite 200, Media, PA 19063, USA
Phone: +12158746280
Sunday: Open 24 hours
Monday: Open 24 hours
Tuesday: Open 24 hours
Wednesday: Open 24 hours
Thursday: Open 24 hours
Friday: Open 24 hours
Saturday: Open 24 hours
Tyrik Douglas
David Clark is the best lawyer I’ve seen in a long time. He is extremely sharp and very intuitive about his clients. He just yesterday finished a case for me and got it thrown right out. If not for him who knows how it may have ended up. I just wanna say thank you Mr. Clarke.
d m
The best and the most genuine Lawyer I have come across till date. He was so helpful with all the advice that I wanted when he was not even sure whether I was going to hire him. He gave the right and genuine advice even when he knew that he might not get the case. Lawyers generally has a habit of trying to put you in a panic situation, so that you might feel the need to hire them. However, whoever is reading this. Do take my word that he is one of the best and most genuine lawyers that you could get. If you are in any kind of query, he is the first person you should reach out to.
Thanks! Your review is awaiting moderation.
Yes. Lawyers are bound by professional rule of conduct, one of the most important is attorney-client confidentiality. This means that you can consult your attorney about all the nitty, gritty, but true details, in order for your case to get the best treatment and preparation. Much like a doctor preparing for a surgery, your attorney will want to know every aspect of the case so they can prepare accordingly and advise accordingly.
As a general rule for a search of a citizen’s private possessions or for an arrest to be made an officer must have “probable cause” prior to conducting the search or making the arrest. One supreme court case describes it as “where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.” Brinegar v. United States, 338 U.S. 160 (1949). Over time this definition and the warrant requirement, that the police first go to a Judge and swear out an oath for a warrant based on what they observed, have both been heavily eroded with a variety of exceptions. Consult today about the facts of your case and whether a search was legal and how that might affect your case if it was not.
Malice or “malice aforethought” is a level of premeditation and intent that is used to distinguish charges. It is most often found in the murder context differentiating murder from manslaughter, a lesser crime. Malice and can also play a role when distinguishing between someone’s negligent action versus actual intent to cause harm. These types of distinctions have a large case law built up around them and are proven by direct or circumstantial evidence often left for a judge or jury to decide in a trial setting.
Thanks! Your answer is awaiting moderation.
Thanks! Your question is awaiting moderation.